Energy saving

Thetius, the globally renowned specialist maritime technology research firm, has partnered with specialist marketing and communications agency - Wake Media to deliver a unique service offering to its clients. The partnership creates an integrated, end-to-end research and communications service built on Thetius’ renowned expertise in market intelligence and Wake Media’s proven track record in powerful multi-channel campaign strategy and execution. Thetius and Wake Media partnership Research options include wide reports and analyses of market and technology trends and innovation David Cocoracchio, Managing Director at Thetius, says, "The maritime industry is at a pivotal moment and the Thetius and Wake Media partnership is intended to equip companies with the information and assets they need to make good decisions." He adds, "With ever-evolving challenges around safety, decarbonisation, technology and economics, we aim to create positive change by providing data-driven insights that can be communicated to the widest possible audience." Deep market intelligence Andy Ford, Managing Director of Wake Media, says, "By blending deep market intelligence with compelling storytelling and world-class execution, this partnership enhances the ability to transform insights into action that resonates with target audiences and drives real engagement."  The partnership is aimed at delivering research commissions of all sizes and scope combined with a tailor-made communications plan to suit all kinds of business and objectives, complete with detailed evaluation when concluded.  Research options include comprehensive reports Research options include comprehensive reports and analyses of market and technology trends and innovation, while the communications services can deliver launch events, media relations and content across the whole marketing mix.

Brunvoll has signed a contract with Rizhao Gangda Shipyard for the delivery of an extensive propulsion, manoeuvring, and dynamic positioning system for an Emergency Towing Vessel (ETV).  The vessel is owned by Smit Lamnalco, a subsidiary of Boskalis, and will operate for the Austral Maritime Safety Authority. Its mission is to protect the marine environment around the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait – some of the most precious marine areas in the world. Brunvoll twin-screw propulsion system Brunvoll consists of the twin-screw propulsion system, 4 tunnel thrusters, and advanced control system The delivery from Brunvoll consists of the twin-screw propulsion system, four tunnel thrusters, and a highly advanced control system. “We are proud and humble for been chosen by such a major player in the maritime industry. The control system for this vessel is one of the most advanced systems to date by Brunvoll." "We have been working with this project for quite a while, and it is outer most rewarding when it finally comes together. All disciplines in Brunvoll have been working closely together with the owner and designer to realise this project, and even though the schedule is tight we will deliver on time,” says Oddbjørn Følsvik, VP Sales at Brunvoll. DP system features The control system delivery is one of the most advanced from Brunvoll to date. It includes Brunvoll’s Propulsion and Thruster Control system (BruCon PTC), Brunvoll’s Dynamic Positioning system (BruCon DP2), and Brunvoll’s Joystick control (BruCon JS). The DP system features Target Tracking, which allows the vessel to follow objects, such as Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs). Twin screw propulsion solution The propellers will have a maximum power output of 3800 kW each, and a diameter of 3.5 metres The twin screw propulsion solution consists of a pair of controllable pitch propellers with reduction gearboxes and nozzles. The propellers will have a maximum power output of 3800 kW each, and a diameter of 3.5 metres. The gearboxes also feature Power Take-Out (PTO) and Power Take-In (PTI), which allows for a broad variety of operational modes. All the different modes are available both in normal operation and while the vessel is in DP2 operation as well. Operational modes of the system  The system will feature the following operational modes: PTO: Main engines and shaft generators running PTO on both sides, delivering both power for propulsion and electricity on board. PTI: Propulsion on both sides running by the electrical motors, powered either by auxiliary motors or batteries. In lower load conditions, this mode can be used to avoid starting up the larger main engine and instead run smaller engines on more optimal load conditions. Hybrid: One side runs PTO and the other runs PTI, i.e., one main engine powers both propellers. Adding further flexibility and optimal running of engines. Bollard pull: Both sides powered by main engines and PTI, for maximum bollard pull. This boost mode takes out the full power of the vessel to support special operations, like towing or anchor handling. Fire Fighting: FIFI pumps engaged with less power available for propulsion, to avoid overloading the main engine. The vessel was designed by Robert Allan Ltd. with the design annotation RASalvor 6500. The dimensions of the ETV are a length of 65 metres and a bollard pull capability of 120 tons.

Sentinel Marine, a member of the Cyan Renewables Group, has signed a shipbuilding contract with Jiangmen Hangtong Shipbuilding Co., Ltd for the construction of a 65-metre multi-role energy support vessel to join their fleet, with options for a further three vessels. The new vessel will bring the fleet number to 15. The initial vessel in this innovative new class is scheduled for delivery in Q2 2027. The newbuild will be a DP2 vessel with a deadweight of 1,600 tonnes, with 375m² of clear deck space and substantial under-deck capacity for fuel oil, potable water, recovered oil, and mono ethylene glycol (MEG). Dutch and Danish ERRV regulations Design includes an optional work-to-work gangway, an under-deck supplies storage and hybrid propulsion Designed as a Group B (A option) UK emergency response and rescue vessel (ERRV), the vessel will feature a fast rescue craft (FRC) and hybrid daughter craft. This transitional vessel will also meet design criteria for Dutch and Danish ERRV regulations and will offer accommodation for between 37 and 47 personnel. In addition to its emergency response capability, the design includes an optional work-to-work gangway, under-deck supplies warehouse and battery hybrid propulsion, ensuring suitability for a broad range of operations, including offshore wind and transitional energy support, government services, carbon capture, and maritime security. Innovation in marine operations Rory Deans, CEO of Sentinel Marine, says, "This new vessel, and the future sister ships, mark an exciting step forward in our strategic vision to deliver ‘Blue to Green' operations. The new vessel will be a cornerstone in our journey towards cleaner, multi-sector marine services that remain robust and reliable." Keng Lin Lee, CEO of Cyan Renewables, said: "Cyan is delighted to be investing in expanding our fleet with this innovative new multi-purpose support vessel enhancing Sentinel's reputation as the pioneering UK-based ERRV provider with the youngest fleet in Europe. The investment aligns with Sentinel Marine and Cyan Renewables' shared commitment to sustainable innovation in marine operations, strengthening the group's capabilities across multiple offshore sectors."

Demand for ammonia is being transformed by the energy transition. Until recently used as an input for fertiliser and chemical products, new markets for green and blue ammonia are emerging, replacing fossil energy in power generation, steel production and marine fuel. Today some 200m tonnes per annum of ammonia is produced worldwide with 20m tpa transported in LPG carriers. The scale of the emerging and potential demand will see these figures rise; how quickly this can be achieved will determine its take-up as a shipping fuel. New or evolving technology The interest in ammonia stems both from its ‘zero emissions’ when used as fuel and because its production isn’t dependent on biogenic carbon sources. As the global economy transitions away from fossil-based fuels, biogenic carbon – from captured CO2, electrolysis and even waste sources – will be subject to increasing competition from other consumers. Shipyards around the world are considering the advantages that operating on ammonia may provide Accordingly, owners, operators, designers, and shipyards around the world are considering the advantages that operating on ammonia may provide. However, when considering any new or evolving technology, it is important to have a clear understanding of not only the benefits, but the challenges that may be involved. Challenges of ammonia bunkering Biogenic carbon will increasingly replace fossil-based carbon in many of the products in use today in industry and consumer goods. Competition from the energy and aviation sectors will inevitably lead to increased prices but production capacity will need to come from industrial sources rather than biomass harvested for this purpose. ABS has produced a Technical and Operational Advisory on Ammonia Bunkering in response to the need for better understanding by members of the maritime industry. It is intended to provide guidance on the technical and operational challenges of ammonia bunkering, both from the bunker vessel’s perspective (or land-side source) and from the receiving vessel’s perspective. Managing emissions Particular attention needs to be paid to the potential presence of ammonia slip, N2O or NOx emissions The carbon emissions from the combustion of ammonia are associated with and dependent on the type and amount of pilot fuel used. The use of biofuel as pilot fuel may further reduce the emissions. In addition, the emissions of sulphur dioxide, heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) drop to zero (or near zero, depending on the pilot fuel used); and particulate matters (PM) are also substantially reduced compared to conventional fossil fuels. However, particular attention needs to be paid to the potential presence of ammonia slip, N2O or NOx emissions, due to the imperfect combustion of ammonia and the use of pilot fuels. These emissions will need to be kept as low as possible by further adjustment and development of the engine technology or using an on-board exhaust gas treatment technology. Currently, hydrogen for ammonia production is typically produced by means of steam methane reforming (SMR) or autothermal reforming (ATR) of natural gas (grey ammonia). If the CO2 emissions from the process of converting natural gas are captured and stored, the ammonia is typically referred to as ‘blue’. Production of blue ammonia Moreover, the production of blue ammonia retains a dependency on fossil fuels. Therefore, ‘green ammonia’, which is produced from hydrogen made from renewable energy sources (green hydrogen), is generally considered to be the end-solution for decarbonisation which leads to a sustainable fuel cycle, while blue ammonia is seen to have an intermediate role. The potential well-to-wake GHG emissions of green ammonia are estimated to be around 91% lower than for grey ammonia, and 85% lower than HFO and MGO. The grey ammonia production network is already well established and global, ensuring easier accessibility across major ports worldwide. Infrastructure and regulation Specific requirements for ammonia bunkering are under discussion by all marine stakeholders This will help green ammonia become readily available for bunkering and distribution once sufficient production and infrastructure are in place. On the other hand, when compared with liquid hydrogen or LNG which can be stored at temperatures of −253°C and −162°C, respectively, liquid ammonia can be stored and transported at −33°C near atmospheric pressure, which allows for easier adaptation of existing fuel infrastructure on ships and at ports. While specific requirements for ammonia bunkering are under discussion by all marine stakeholders, the requirements for shipping ammonia as cargo, including loading and unloading operations, have been established in the marine industry and are covered by the IMO International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk (IGC Code) and incorporated in the ABS Rules for Building and Classing Marine Vessels Part 5C Chapter 8 “Vessels Intended to Carry Liquefied Gases in Bulk”.  For the use of ammonia as bunker fuel, all segments of the marine industry (including IMO, Class Societies, Port Authorities, and industry agencies) are working to develop requirements and procedures specific to ammonia bunkering operations. Refer to the section “Regulatory Organisation” of this Advisory for the current activities of each marine industry segment.  Bunkering Options Ship-to-ship bunkering is the most popular mode for transferring fuel to ocean-going vessels There are three main methods of bunkering ammonia to ships. Truck-to-ship is the process of transferring ammonia from trucks or truck trailers to a receiving vessel using ammonia as fuel. Typically, the tanks on the truck are pressurised and store ammonia at ambient temperature. To increase bunker capacity and transfer rates, a manifold may be used to connect several trucks simultaneously to supply the receiving vessel. Truck-to-ship transfer operations may provide greater operational flexibility, but at the same time could induce operational restrictions and limitations by the local Authority. Ship-to-ship bunkering is the most popular mode for transferring fuel to ocean-going vessels, such as container ships, tankers, and bulk carriers, which require large fuel capacities and greater quantities of fuel to be bunkered. Terminal-to-ship bunkering transfers ammonia from an ammonia storage terminal pipeline connected to receiving vessels via a hose assembly or loading arm. Ammonia Safety Ammonia is toxic and reacts violently and explosively with oxidising gases such as chlorine, bromine, acids, and other halogens. When ammonia is inhaled, swallowed or absorbed via skin contact, it reacts with water in the body, producing ammonium hydroxide. Due to these toxicity issues, ammonia is classified as a hazardous substance, with the level and time of exposure being controlled by several national standards.  The level of competency needed for each task depends on the role and duties of the individual A combination of both training and operational experience is key to developing the required competencies for ammonia bunkering operations. The level of competency needed for each task depends on the role and responsibilities of the individual. Therefore, the training may vary from person to person. Seafarers on board ships using ammonia fuel should have completed training to attain the abilities that are appropriate to the capacity to be filled, and duties and responsibilities to be taken up. The master, officers, ratings and other personnel on ships using ammonia fuel should be trained and qualified in accordance with regulation V/3 of the STCW Convention and section A-V/3 of the STCW Code, taking into account the specific hazards of ammonia used as fuel. Ship-specific training  Ship-specific training is to be reviewed and approved by governing regulatory authorities. The IGF Code provides detailed training requirements for ships that use gases or other low-flashpoint fuels. Ships under the jurisdiction of flag administrations signatory to SOLAS should ensure that seafarers should have the specified certificates of proficiency and the administration shall approve courses and issue endorsements indicating completion of the qualification. All crew must be provided with and be made aware of the emergency procedures and must be trained in any roles and responsibilities they may have. Training, drills and exercises to prepare crews for emergencies are to be provided. Lessons learned from past operations should be incorporated to improve emergency procedures. Procedures should cover all scenarios specific to the ship, type of incident, equipment, and associated areas.

Global transportation networks are becoming increasingly interconnected, with digital systems playing a crucial role in ensuring the smooth operation of ports and supply chains. However, this reliance on technology can also create vulnerabilities, as demonstrated by the recent ransomware attack on Nagoya Port. As Japan's busiest shipping hub, the port's operations were brought to a standstill for two days, highlighting the potential for significant disruption to national economies and supply chains.  Transportation sector  The attack began with the port's legacy computer system, which handles shipping containers, being knocked offline. This forced the port to halt the handling of shipping containers that arrived at the terminal, effectively disrupting the flow of goods. The incident was a stark reminder of the risks associated with the convergence of information technology (IT) and operational technology (OT) in ports and other critical infrastructures.  This is not an isolated incident, but part of a broader trend of escalating cyber threats targeting critical infrastructure. The transportation sector must respond by bolstering its defences, enhancing its cyber resilience, and proactively countering these threats. The safety and efficiency of our transportation infrastructure, and by extension our global economy, depend on it.  Rising threat to port security and supply chains  XIoT, from sensors on shipping containers to automatic cranes, are vital to trendy port functions OT, once isolated from networked systems, is now increasingly interconnected. This integration has expanded the attack surface for threat actors. A single breach in a port's OT systems can cause significant disruption, halting the movement of containers and impacting the flow of goods. This is not a hypothetical scenario, but a reality that has been demonstrated in recent cyberattacks on major ports.  Adding another layer of complexity is the extended Internet of Things (XIoT), an umbrella term for all cyber-physical systems. XIoT devices, from sensors on shipping containers to automated cranes, are now integral to modern port operations. These devices are delivering safer, more efficient automated vehicles, facilitating geo-fencing for improved logistics, and providing vehicle health data for predictive maintenance. XIoT ecosystem  However, the XIoT ecosystem also presents new cybersecurity risks. Each connected device is a potential entry point for cybercriminals, and the interconnected nature of these devices means that an attack on one, which can move laterally and can have a ripple effect throughout the system.  The threat landscape is evolving, with cybercriminals becoming more sophisticated and their attacks more damaging with a business continuity focus. The growing interconnectivity between OT and XIoT in port operations and supply chains is also presenting these threat actors with a greater attack surface. Many older OT systems were never designed to be connected in this way and are unlikely to be equipped to deal with modern cyber threats. Furthermore, the increasing digitisation of ports and supply chains has led to a surge in the volume of data being generated and processed. This data, if not properly secured, can be a goldmine for cybercriminals. The potential for data breaches adds another dimension to the cybersecurity challenges facing the transportation sector.  Role of cyber resilience in protecting service availability  Cyber resilience refers to organisation's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from threats As the threats to port security and supply chains become increasingly complex, the concept of cyber resilience takes on a new level of importance. Cyber resilience refers to an organisation's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from cyber threats. It goes beyond traditional cybersecurity measures, focusing not just on preventing attacks, but also on minimising the impact of attacks that do occur and ensuring a quick recovery.  In the context of port operations and supply chains, cyber resilience is crucial. The interconnected nature of these systems means that a cyberattack can have far-reaching effects, disrupting operations not just at the targeted port, but also at other ports and throughout the supply chain. A resilient system is one that can withstand such an attack and quickly restore normal operations. Port operations and supply chains The growing reliance on OT and the XIoT in port operations and supply chains presents unique challenges for cyber resilience. OT systems control physical processes and are often critical to safety and service availability. A breach in an OT system can have immediate and potentially catastrophic physical consequences. Similarly, XIoT devices are often embedded in critical infrastructure and can be difficult to patch or update, making them vulnerable to attacks.  Building cyber resilience in these systems requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves implementing robust security measures, such as strong access controls and network segmentation, to prevent attacks. It also involves continuous monitoring and detection to identify and respond to threats as they occur. But perhaps most importantly, it involves planning and preparation for the inevitable breaches that will occur, ensuring that when they do, the impact is minimised, and normal operations can be quickly restored.  Building resilience across port security and supply chains   In the face of cyber threats, the transport sector must adopt a complete method of cybersecurity In the face of escalating cyber threats, the transportation sector must adopt a comprehensive approach to cybersecurity. This involves not just implementing robust security measures, but also fostering a culture of cybersecurity awareness and compliance throughout the organisation.  A key component of a comprehensive cybersecurity strategy is strong access controls. This involves ensuring that only authorised individuals have access to sensitive data and systems. It also involves implementing multi-factor authentication and regularly reviewing and updating access permissions. Strong access controls can prevent unauthorised access to systems and data, reducing the risk of both internal and external threats. Network segmentation Network segmentation is another crucial measure. By dividing a network into separate segments, organisations can limit the spread of a cyberattack within their network. This can prevent an attack on one part of the network from affecting the entire system. Network segmentation also makes it easier to monitor and control the flow of data within the network, further enhancing security.  Regular vulnerability assessments and patch management are also essential. Vulnerability assessments involve identifying and evaluating potential security weaknesses in the system, while patch management involves regularly updating and patching software to fix these vulnerabilities. These measures can help organisations stay ahead of cybercriminals and reduce the risk of exploitation.  EU’s NIS2 Directive EU’s NIS2 Directive came into effect, and member states have until October 2024 to put it into law The transportation sector must also be prepared for greater legislative responsibility in the near future. The EU’s NIS2 Directive recently came into effect, and member states have until October 2024 to put it into law. The Directive aims to increase the overall level of cyber preparedness by mandating capabilities such as Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs). Transport is among the sectors labelled as essential by the bill, meaning it will face a high level of scrutiny. Getting to grips with the complexities of XIoT and OT integration will be essential for organisations to achieve compliance and avoid fines. Global transportation infrastructure Finally, organisations must prepare for the inevitable breaches that will occur. This involves developing an incident response plan that outlines the steps to be taken in the event of a breach. It also involves regularly testing and updating this plan to ensure its effectiveness. A well-prepared organisation can respond quickly and effectively to a breach, minimising its impact and ensuring a quick recovery.  In conclusion, mastering transportation cybersecurity requires a comprehensive, proactive approach. It involves implementing robust technical measures, fostering a culture of cybersecurity awareness, and preparing for the inevitable breaches that will occur. By taking these steps, organisations can enhance their cyber resilience, protect their critical operations, and ensure the security of our global transportation infrastructure.

Health and safety are key considerations for all maritime organisations, in particular, for those operating in remote locations or where extreme weather conditions may put workforces at greater risk. With COVID-19 here to stay for the foreseeable future, it is vital that shipping organisations consider both the short and long term safeguarding measures, which are required to protect their workers at sea. COVID-19 management plans Establishing safe working conditions and providing onboard expert medical care has always been of paramount importance but, now, effective COVID-19 management plans have also become essential in creating safe working environments and, importantly, in keeping them operational when personnel contract COVID-19. In these circumstances, controlling the spread of infection remains mission critical and for companies, like RMI In these circumstances, controlling the spread of infection remains mission critical and for companies, like Remote Medical International (RMI), which provides health and medical support to teams, operating in remote or hard to reach locations, the need for COVID testing services has resulted in rapid scale up and business diversification. Early on during the COVID-19 pandemic, the world learned that many symptoms presented by an individual had the potential to be a positive case. This knowledge was used to respond to clients’ needs, in order to get employees back to work safely, as quickly as possible. COVID pre-mobilisation testing The sharp rise in demand for testing has resulted in an upscale of COVID pre-mobilisation testing at ports and harbours, for teams heading offshore, on-site COVID-19 audits, and virtual consultancy for remote teams. This shift in demand means that over 25% of the business is now COVID-19 related. Over two years, RMI’s medical experts have helped various shipping organisations on screening programmes that are tailored to their current needs. Their global presence and team of over 200 highly qualified medics, means they are well set to provide assistance services 24/7, with telemedicine support, case management and security services, adding to a one-stop-shop for all global medical and risk management requirements. One of the key concerns of shipping organisations has been how to manage a potential outbreak of COVID-19 offshore, and RMI has seen a variety of new demands imposed on personnel, who await embarkment at UK ports, for activities in the North Sea. In 2020, RMI began to work closely with a leading independent oil and gas company, to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 offshore. Ad-hoc testing for personnel embarking and travelling offshore Initially, RMI issued ad-hoc testing to personnel, who were due to embark and travel offshore Initially, RMI issued ad-hoc testing to personnel, who were due to embark and travel offshore. Crews were ranked by risk and then tested as a matter of priority: personnel would stay in a local hotel, awaiting the results of their test and if negative, would soon travel offshore. However, very quickly, the need for ad-hoc testing progressed into the requirement for regular daily testing, not made any easier by the complications of sending thousands of staff offshore weekly during a pandemic. RMI medics and shipping staff combine The hotel facilities were, therefore, expanded and in total, over 18,695 personnel were tested. RMI’s medics, already highly trained and qualified, had to adapt quickly to the novel protocols required, when providing a rapid point of care PCR test, delivering 80 to 90 tests a day within an eight-hour window meant that there was no room for error. In this way, the collaboration of RMI’s medics with shipping staff under increasingly challenging conditions ultimately protected lives and ensured smooth running of shipping operations. Rise in demand for COVID-19 risk audits As the COVID-19 pandemic progresses and with undoubtedly more variants to come, there is an increase in demand for COVID-19 risk audits, which can really help shipping companies to ensure their operations, stay on track. For example, RMI conducted a robust risk assessment on the impact of COVID-19 on employees living at sea and working offshore in Equatorial Guinea. COVID-19 has made it very challenging to find good medical staff for work – the demand has been far higher than the supply at times, during the past year. RMI sets a very high bar and is committed to only employing the very best, as they have a reputation to protect, as well as the lives of the people that their medics are there to support. This role particularly suits ex-combat medics, who are looking to use their skills in a different setting and in this case, RMI selected and sent out only the very best to Equatorial Guinea. Their experienced medical auditor, who had just returned from working in Afghanistan, was deployed to document the potential risks at the airport, during their 10-day quarantine in-country, and throughout their assignment offshore. RMI’s audits designed to cover all bases Remote Medical International’s audits are designed to ensure that all bases are covered Remote Medical International’s audits are designed to ensure that all bases are covered. For this project, each location was broken down by levels of risk and included recommendations on how to prevent a possible COVID-19 infection. Each assessment included the level of probability for infection, as well as how to best prevent it, such as always wearing a mask, or limiting access to certain communal areas. Following the audit, our recommendations consisted of overarching actions that would ultimately prioritise the health and safety of the offshore employees.  This included the implementation of a COVID-19 surveillance testing program for facility workers at the quarantine site, establishing a more structured COVID-19 testing programme, creating a training programme to support service staff, and the safest ways to provide services to employees onboard. RMI delivers critical support in vital and diverse ways It really is the case that no matter how remote the location or vessel, RMI can deliver critical support in vital and diverse ways. One of their recent operations has seen them provide emergency medical advice to US government owned and operated ships and units, located throughout the world, via the company’s topside assistance service, meaning that no crew is ever alone. The medical providers onboard could contact the Global Coordination Centre, at any time and be connected to a physician for medical advice within mere minutes. This type of remote support is what can enable crucial operations to continue all year round, despite the COVID-19 pandemic and RMI hopes to support many more, as they navigate these turbulent times.

The Dark Fleet refers to a network of vessels that operate outside of standard maritime regulations, often used to transport sanctioned goods such as oil. These shadowy vessels are also referred to by terms such as Parallel Fleet and/or Shadow, Gray or Ghost fleet. The terms are all manifestations of the same thing – ships that are owned, structured, and operated to avoid exposure to sanctions. Fleet of ships “In fact I would prefer that we use the term Parallel Fleet because it more accurately describes what it is,” says Mike Salthouse, Head of External Affairs, of NorthStandard, a Protection and Indemnity (P&I) insurer. “Specifically, it is a fleet of ships operating in parallel to mainstream shipping while avoiding use of service providers that are subject to sanctions legislation.” Modern shipping sanctions Sanctions were to be enforced not just against the sanctions-breaking vessel but also the services Modern shipping sanctions can be traced back to the introduction of the U.S. Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act 2010 or “CISADA”.  Under CISADA for the first time, sanctions were to be enforced not just against the sanctions-breaking vessel but also the services (for example insurance, class, flag, banks) that the vessel used. EU/G7 Coalition adopting sanctions As a result, all maritime service providers sought to distance themselves and introduce contractual termination clauses in their service contracts forcing such vessels to either trade without such services or to access them from non-sanctioning jurisdictions. This led immediately to the creation of mainly Iranian ships that could continue to carry cargoes subject to western economic sanctions – such as Iranian oil. However, the fleet has grown exponentially following the EU/G7 Coalition adopting sanctions targeting Russian shipping. Today the majority (but not all) of the Dark Fleet is engaged carrying Russian cargoes – but other trades include Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela. Protection of the marine environment Dark Fleet undermines transparent governance policies that ensure the welfare and safety “It might be that a removal of Russian sanctions would remove the need for such a fleet,” adds Salthouse. “But for so long as nations use maritime sanctions as a foreign policy tool, my own view is that the Dark Fleet phenomenon will continue to facilitate sanctioned trades.” The Dark Fleet undermines transparent governance policies that ensure the welfare and safety of those on board and the protection of the marine environment. In recent years, the safety of tankers has improved significantly. These improvements have been driven by factors such as greater operational oversight from the oil majors, younger double hull vessels, greater operational scrutiny, and more rigorous legislation. Safety has been prioritised over all else. Transport oil using ships and services “The commercial dynamics that apply to the Dark Fleet are very different,” says Salthouse. “The overwhelming commercial imperative is not safety but to transport oil using ships and services to which sanctions legislation does not apply. As such, the customer and regulatory oversight is much reduced.” The vessels used by the Dark Fleet also tend to be older. Even if it were possible to find shipyards that were prepared to build for use carrying sanctioned cargoes (and so risk secondary sanctions depriving them of access to western financial markets and insurers), the long build times mean that such ships would not become available for several years. As such, the vessels that comprise the Dark Fleet tend to be end-of-life and aged 15 years or older. Commercial reinsurance markets The insurers of the ship will likely have been unable to access commercial reinsurance markets used If and when an accident happens, the ability of the insurer to respond by using commercial salvors and pollution responders will be curtailed by sanctions legislation, and the insurers of the ship will likely have been unable to access commercial reinsurance markets commonly used to access the high levels of cover required to fully compensate victims. Sanctioning individual ships is an effective way of addressing the Dark Fleet because shipping that trades internationally invariably needs access to western financial and service markets, which a designation deprives them of. Collaboration with mainstream shipping EU/G7 Coalition States to date have designated over 100 vessels, but in practical terms, the Dark Fleet is much larger than this – somewhere in the region 600 to 1000 vessels – so more needs to be done, says Salthouse. Thought also needs to be given as to how to dispose of old designated tonnage (as designation will prevent scrapping) whilst at the same time addressing the supply side so that designated ships cannot simply be replaced. “That can only be achieved in collaboration with mainstream shipping which should be consulted and partner with governments to achieve their aim,” says Salthouse. Majority of shipowners and service Dark Fleet will thrive for so long as maritime sanctions are deployed by states as a means of foreign policy goals Without concerted state action delving with the existing fleet and its access to new ships, the Dark Fleet will thrive for so long as maritime sanctions are deployed by states as a means of achieving their foreign policy goals. The cost of compliance to mainstream shipping is huge. The vast majority of shipowners and service providers deploy significant resources to avoid inadvertently contravening applicable sanctions. EU/G7 Coalition partners should recognise that and work with the shipping industry to marginalise the commercial space served by the Parallel/Dark Fleet rather than simply imposing ever greater and more complex compliance requirements, comments Salthouse. Use of EU/G7 Coalition service In a majority of cases, the Parallel Fleet is not breaking any laws. With the exception of the UN sanctions programme directed at North Korea, the Parallel/Dark Fleet can trade perfectly lawfully. For example, it is not illegal for a Russian flagged ship, insured in Russia, classed in Russia and trading with non-EU/G7 Coalition partners to transport Russian oil sold above the price cap through international waters to non-EU/G7 Coalition states provided the trade does not make use of EU/G7 Coalition service providers. Use of established service providers The Parallel/Dark Fleet is bad for shipping and undermines EU/G7, and on occasions, UN sanctions programmes, says Salthouse. States cannot control a trade when the ships carrying the cargoes and the service providers involved are not subject to the jurisdiction of that State. Similarly, when ships sink and cause pollution, the whole shipping industry suffers by association, and the additional complexities involved in responding to a casualty that cannot make use of established service providers could make a bad situation much worse.

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) can contribute to decarbonisation of the maritime industry, especially when combined with other approaches. CCS allows ships to continue using fossil fuels while capturing and storing the emitted CO2. It’s a helpful interim approach if a vessel’s immediate transition to alternative fuels is not feasible due to infrastructure limits or technology constraints. CCS can extend a vessel’s operational lifespan, both reducing emissions from existing vessels while avoiding premature scrapping and associated environmental impacts. Technology challenges  There are technology challenges, such as higher fuel consumption and process costs for ships As the industry works toward the use of zero-emission fuels such as green hydrogen, ammonia and methanol, CCS offers a more gradual and realistic pathway to decarbonisation. CCS is also an attractive option for long-haul shipping routes where alternative fuel infrastructure may be limited. However, there are technology challenges, such as higher fuel consumption and operation costs for ships. Space constraints are another obstacle considering the needs to operate and install CCS equipment on board ships. Clear and supportive regulation More work is needed to provide secure and reliable long-term storage of captured CO2, which is still under development. Technology advancement and government incentives are also needed to increase the economic viability of Carbon Capture and Storage for ships operators. Clear and supportive regulation paves the way for widespread adoption of CCS in the maritime sector, including standards for capture, transport, and storage.  Carbon capture and storage The amine solution, now loaded with CO2, is then sent to a regenerator (stripper) In a CCS system, carbon dioxide (CO2) is captured from a ship’s exhaust gases after the fuel has been burned. This often involves chemical absorption, in which the exhaust gases pass through a solvent that absorbs the CO2. A contactor (absorber) uses an amine solution to react chemically with the CO2, forming a carbamate compound. This effectively removes the CO2 from the flue gas. The amine solution, now loaded with CO2, is then sent to a regenerator (stripper). Heat is applied to the solution, causing the carbamate to decompose, releasing the captured CO2. Onshore storage sites The CO2 is then separated and stored onboard in high-pressure tanks as a liquid, and later offloaded at designated ports for transport to onshore storage sites.  There is an energy penalty in the process, since CCS itself requires energy, which can increase fuel consumption and operating costs for the ship. Because onboard storage capacity for captured CO2 can be limited, frequent offloading is required. Adoption timeline for CCS Most CCS projects in the maritime sector are still in the research and development phase In the near term (5 to 10 years), initial deployments of CCS on select vessels will likely focus on niche applications or specific routes. Most CCS projects in the maritime sector are still in the research and development phase. Some pilot projects and demonstrations are underway to test the feasibility and effectiveness of CCS technologies, but large-scale commercial deployments of CCS systems on board ships are still to come. If technological advancements and economic viability improve, CCS could see more widespread adoption in the maritime sector within the next 10 to 20 years, particularly for vessels where alternative fuel options are limited or not yet feasible. The development of a robust infrastructure for the transport and storage of captured CO2 will be crucial for the large-scale deployment of CCS in the maritime. Requirements of CCS systems for maritime use Looking long-term (20 years or more), CCS could become a mature technology integrated into the broader maritime decarbonisation landscape, potentially playing a role alongside other technologies like alternative fuels and energy efficiency measures. Continued research and development will aim to improve the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and space requirements of CCS systems for maritime use. The development of more efficient and compact CCS systems is crucial for their widespread adoption in the maritime sector. Reducing the costs, including capital expenditures and operational expenses, is also essential. Clear and supportive regulations, including carbon pricing mechanisms and incentives for CCS deployment, will encourage its adoption. Complementary technologies toward decarbonisation Another option is using fuel cells to convert hydrogen or other fuels into electricity for propulsion CCS can be used in conjunction with transitional fuels like Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), capturing and storing CO2 emissions from LNG-powered vessels to reduce the carbon footprint while the industry transitions to zero-emission fuels. CCS can be particularly valuable for sectors where zero-emission alternatives may not be readily available or feasible, such as long-haul shipping. CCS can also serve as a backstop technology, providing a potential solution for residual emissions from alternative fuel pathways, even if they are considered low-carbon. A range of alternative fuel scenarios drive research and development into new technologies such as biofuels, green hydrogen, ammonia, and methanol. Another possibility is using fuel cells to convert hydrogen or other fuels into electricity for propulsion. Better battery technology, including better capacity and charging infrastructure, is needed. And ship designs must be optimised for alternative fuels, including storage and handling systems. Next stages for CCS The next stage in the development of carbon capture and storage (CCS) for maritime vessels will likely involve full-scale demonstration projects, moving beyond small-scale prototypes and lab tests to real-world applications on commercial vessels. More compact and lightweight systems will be developed to reduce the weight and space requirements on board ships. Viable business models and financial mechanisms are needed to make CCS economically attractive for ship owners. A clear and consistent regulatory framework can incentivise CCS adoption and ensure compliance with environmental standards. There also needs to be more public awareness and understanding of the role of CCS in decarbonising the maritime sector.

U.S. President Joe Biden has signed an Executive Order aimed at shoring up the cybersecurity of U.S. ports, a move fuelled by mounting concerns about the vulnerability of this critical infrastructure to cyberattacks. This initiative marks a significant shift in policy, empowering key agencies and outlining concrete actions to bolster defences. By empowering key agencies, establishing clear standards, and fostering collaboration, the initiative aims to strengthen U.S. ports against the evolving threat of cyberattacks, safeguarding the nation's maritime economy and national security. Expanded authority for DHS The core of the Executive Order lies in granting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Coast Guard expanded authority to address maritime cyber threats. DHS gains the power to directly tackle these challenges, while the Coast Guard receives specific tools: Mandating Action: The Coast Guard can now compel vessels and waterfront facilities to address cyber vulnerabilities that endanger safety. This proactive approach aims to prevent incidents before they occur. Enhanced Visibility: Mandatory reporting of any cyber threats or incidents targeting ports and harbours becomes mandatory. This real-time information sharing allows for swifter response and mitigation efforts. Control and Inspection: The Coast Guard gains the authority to restrict the movement of vessels suspected of posing cyber threats. Additionally, inspections of vessels and facilities deemed risky can be conducted. Mandatory cybersecurity standards Furthermore, the initiative emphasises the importance of collaboration and information sharing Beyond these broad powers, the Executive Order establishes foundational elements for improved cybersecurity. Mandatory cybersecurity standards will be implemented for U.S. ports' networks and systems, ensuring a baseline level of protection across the board. This standardisation aims to eliminate weak links in the chain and prevent attackers from exploiting individual vulnerabilities. Furthermore, the initiative emphasises the importance of collaboration and information sharing. Mandatory reporting of cyber incidents fosters transparency and allows government agencies and private sector partners to work together in mitigating threats. Additionally, the Executive Order encourages increased information sharing among all stakeholders, facilitating a unified response to potential attacks. Risk management strategies To address specific concerns, the Coast Guard will issue a Maritime Security Directive targeting operators of Chinese-manufactured ship-to-shore cranes. This directive outlines risk management strategies to address identified vulnerabilities in these critical pieces of port infrastructure. The long-term success of this initiative hinges on effective implementation. The Executive Order encourages investment in research and development for innovative cybersecurity solutions, recognising the need for continuous improvement and adaptation to evolving threats. Recognising the urgency of cyber threats Some concerns exist regarding the potential burden of yielding with new rules for less port operators The initiative has been met with widespread support from port authorities, industry stakeholders, and cybersecurity experts who recognise the urgency of addressing cyber threats. However, some concerns exist regarding the potential burden of complying with new regulations for smaller port operators. Effective communication, resource allocation, and collaboration between all stakeholders will be crucial in ensuring the successful implementation of this comprehensive plan. “This Executive Order is a positive move that will give the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) additional authority to enhance cybersecurity within the marine transportation system and respond to cyber incidents,” comments Josh Kolleda, practice director, Transport at NCC Group a cybersecurity consulting firm. The more impactful and noteworthy piece is the associated Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) from the USCG on “Cybersecurity in the Marine Transportation System,” adds Kolleda. Portions of the proposed rulemaking look similar to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Security Directive for the rail industry and the Emergency Amendment for the aviation industry. Coordinating with TSA on lessons learned The focus here is on the PRC because nearly 80% of cranes operated at U.S. ports are manufactured The USCG should be coordinating with TSA on lessons learned and incorporating them into additional guidance to stakeholders and processes to review plans and overall compliance, says Kolleda. “At first glance, the NPRM provides a great roadmap to increase cybersecurity posture across the various stakeholders, but it underestimates the cost to private companies in meeting the requirements, particularly in areas such as penetration testing,” says Kolleda. “It is unclear if or how the federal government will provide support for compliance efforts. As this seems to be an unfunded mandate, many private companies will opt for the bare minimum in compliance.” “Cyber espionage and threats have been reported by the Director of National Intelligence from multiple nation-states including China, Russia, and Iran,” adds Paul Kingsbury, principal security consultant & North America Maritime Lead at NCC Group. The focus here is on the People’s Republic of China (PRC) because nearly 80% of cranes operated at U.S. ports are manufactured there, he says. Minimum cyber security requirements “The state-sponsored cyber actors’ goal is to disrupt critical functions by deploying destructive malware resulting in disruption to the U.S. supply chain,” says Kingsbury. “These threat actors do not only originate in China or other nation-states but also include advanced persistent threats (APTs) operated by criminal syndicates seeking financial gain from such disruptions. The threat actors don’t care where the crane was manufactured, but rather seek targets with limited protections and defences. The minimum cyber security requirements outlined within the NPRM should be adopted by all crane operators and all cranes, regardless of where they are manufactured.” Kingsbury adds: “The pioneering risk outlined in the briefing is that these cranes (PRC manufactured) are controlled, serviced, and programmed from remote locations in China. While this is a valid concern and should be assessed, there are certainly instances where PRC-manufactured cranes do not have control systems manufactured in PRC. For example, there are situations in MTS facilities where older cranes have been retrofitted with control systems of EU or Japanese origin.” Monitoring wireless threats “The Biden Administration’s recent Executive Order is a critical step forward in protecting U.S. ports from cyberattacks and securing America’s supply chains,” says Dr. Brett Walkenhorst, CTO at Bastille, a wireless threat intelligence technology company. “To ensure proper defense against malicious actors accessing port-side networks, attention must also be paid to common wireless vulnerabilities. Attacks leveraging Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and IoT protocols may be used to access authorised infrastructure including IT and OT systems. Monitoring such wireless threats is an important element in a comprehensive approach to upgrading the defences of our nation’s critical infrastructure.”

Bennett Marine, a Division of Yamaha Marine Systems Company, needed a solution that integrated solar energy generation and mechanical upgrades to optimise both sustainability and working environment outcomes. However, adding the cooling capacity needed by a large warehouse, and the employees working there, during the long Floridian summers could significantly increase the utility load on the building. Solution Bennett Marine’s management approached its outsourced service provider, ABM. Having successfully completed two lighting upgrades on site, and acting as the current janitorial service provider, ABM took Bennet Marine’s request to its Infrastructure Solutions team. ABM’s Infrastructure Solutions designed an energy-efficient HVAC system supported by a rooftop solar PV array that offset utility costs with renewable energy, leading to a net 58% reduction in total utility usage for the building. ABM also assisted in securing tax credits and energy incentives for the project, as well as a new roof for the facility with additional building envelope improvements. Finding a better solution for the client ABM provides a consultative approach to help clients achieve sustainability goals, enable capital improvements" “Service experts across our company worked together to solve a need and deliver the sustainability solution Bennett Marine needed,” said Mark Hawkinson, President of ABM Technical Solutions. He adds, “ABM provides a consultative approach to help clients achieve sustainability goals, enable capital improvements, improve indoor air quality, address waste and inefficiency, and create a positive impact for communities.” In addition to the new roof, net energy offset, and improved cooling, ABM was able to assist the project in receiving an estimated $226,000 in tax credits and $224,000 in Energy Incentives through the Federal MACRS (Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System). Benefits ABM’s Infrastructure Solutions enable businesses to invest in critical infrastructure needs and achieve sustainability, security, and resilience goals. A custom energy program drives costs out of operating budgets and redirects savings to critical needs, helping fund improvements. Highlights of the project for the Deerfield, Florida, warehouse include: Projected energy cost savings in the first year of $12,701 Replacement of ageing roof and speed roll doors to reduce energy loss Solar panel installation is capable of offsetting 66% of the building’s utility use

Korea Marine Transport Company Ship Management (KMTC SM) has reported annual fuel savings worth approximately US$540,000 in total after installing Accelleron’s digital engine optimisation solution Tekomar XPERT on 12 Panamax vessels. The fuel savings enabled KMTC SM to reduce its CO2 emissions by about 4,200 tons. Tekomar XPERT delivers engine optimisation recommendations based on thermodynamic insights that aim to bring engines back to the operating performance achieved at “new” conditions. The solution can be applied to any engine and turbocharger make. KMTC SM followed the advisory from Tekomar XPERT, tracked engine performance and benchmarked engines and vessels through Tekomar XPERT’s web portal (Loreka).  Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) ratings The reduced emissions will translate to better CII ratings and lower exposure to carbon pricing KMTC Ship Management General Manager of Environmental Technology, Jin-Seob Lee, said: “Based on the big savings on fuel cost and emission reduction, we aim to install Tekomar XPERT on our remaining 16 self-managed vessels, and will be recommending its installation on 22 other vessels managed by third parties.” Accelleron anticipates that KMTC’s fuel bill will be reduced by around US$1.3 million a year when Tekomar XPERT is deployed across all 50 vessels. The reduced emissions will translate to better Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) ratings and lower exposure to carbon pricing, including the EU Emissions Trading System, which will apply to shipping from 2024. KMTC SM’s own measurements KMTC SM was able to track improvements in performance thanks to intuitive indicators and actionable insight from Tekomar XPERT. The reduced fuel consumption at the end of the 12-month period highlighted a significant increase in vessel performance over the year. This was verified by KMTC SM’s own measurements. Accelleron Global Head of Sales & Operations, Shailesh Shirsekar, said: “Efficient engines are one of the keys to reducing fuel costs, emissions and carbon price exposure, enabling optimisation without impact on vessel operation. With simple guidance from Tekomar XPERT, ship operators can ensure that the engines are running at their very best, laying the foundation for lower lifecycle costs as well as regulatory compliance.”

Båtbygg AS has placed an order with Teknotherm for a complete ammonia freezing system for Austral Fisheries’ new longline fishing vessel. The vessel is designed by Marin Teknikk AS for operation in the Antarctic Ocean, surrounded by some of the world’s harshest weather conditions. Teknotherm freezing system The newbuild no. 009 and named ‘Austral Odyssey’ will have a length of 70 metres The newbuild no. 009 and named ‘Austral Odyssey’ will have a length of 70 metres and a breadth of 14.6 metres. Delivery of the ship will be in December 2025. Freezing-in of products will be by blast freezers and plate freezers, all served by the ammonia freezing machinery, which will also keep the storage hold and bait hold at low temperature. Austral Fisheries Austral Fisheries owns and operates one of Australia’s largest fleets of fishing vessels. The fleet consists of 18 vessels with different areas of operation and catch, from toothfish in the south to prawns and tropical reef fish in the north. Austral Fisheries took delivery of the fishing vessel MS ‘Cape Arkona’ from Båtbygg AS in 2020, which also features a complete freezing system from Teknotherm, and they are proud to once again be chosen as a supplier to Båtbygg and Austral Fisheries.

More than almost any trend, decarbonisation is driving the future of maritime. That reality alone makes decarbonisation the perfect topic for our first-ever Expert Panel Roundtable column. Traditional maritime fuels, like heavy fuel oil, release harmful pollutants that contribute to air pollution and have adverse health effects. We have to do better, and discussions in the maritime industry centre on which combination of alternative fuels and other technologies can solve the shorter- and longer-term challenges of decarbonisation. For an update on the various approaches, we asked our Expert Panel Roundtable: What are the latest maritime technology trends in decarbonisation?